Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zwer's avatar

Over $100k for a S2000 that's been sitting since 2009?

Mark E's avatar

Another enjoyable episode. Cole provides a great lifestyle angle on watches and gear - much more interesting/entertaining than just watch nerdery backed by no other interests. I also enjoyed the Inside Baseball discussion on the genesis of Cole's Watches in the Wild series.

Speaking of watch nerdery, I totally disagree with James' impression that nobody cares about yet another watch dimension. After the episode I went back to look at watches I have that "wear smaller than their size" and "wear bigger than their size", and I think the dimension under discussion may in fact be the key to nailing down this phenomenon.

I'd like to submit that "stance" is too vague. Here's a suggestion: call it Springbar Standoff and measure it as follows: Take a watch head with springbars installed but no strap. Place the watch face up on a flat surface like a table. Measure how high above the surface the springbars are. This is the Springbar Standoff.

A few examples: My Seiko SPB183 wears smaller than its 42.7mm diameter, which I like. It turns out to have a very low Springbar Standoff. I have several Confusing Fall Warblers (aka Hamilton 9219 field watches) that just disappear on my wrist. They also have very low Springbar Standoffs. I have a Longines (modern) Marine Nationale that has both long lugs and a high Springbar Standoff. It wears much larger than its 38.5mm diameter would suggest.

So there it is... Thoughts?

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?